◆UAP / Naval
The 2019 USS Kidd UAP Incursions: Analysis of Declassified Navy Deck Logs and Intelligence Disclosures
July 14, 2019 Off the coast of Southern California, USA
#UAP#Navy#USS Kidd#FOIA#AARO#Maritime Security
— EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A series of persistent UAP incursions involving the USS Kidd and other Navy destroyers displayed advanced aeronautical capabilities in a sensitive training range. Declassified deck logs confirm the objects maintained proximity for hours, challenging conventional drone explanations.
The 2019 Naval Encounters\n\nIn July 2019, a series of significant UAP incursions occurred off the coast of Southern California, involving the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Kidd (DDG-100) and several other vessels within a Navy carrier strike group. Unlike transient sightings, these encounters were sustained over several nights, involving multiple objects that displayed advanced aeronautical capabilities, including stationary hovering in high-wind conditions and rapid acceleration that exceeded known commercial drone specifications of the era.\n\n## The Incident and Fleet Response\n\nOn July 14, 2019, deck logs from the USS Kidd recorded the first observation of two 'unmanned aerial vehicles' (UAVs) at approximately 22:00 hours. The logs indicate that the ship's SNOOPIE (Ship Nautical or Otherwise Photographic Interpretation and Examination) teams were immediately deployed to document the craft. Over the following days, similar incursions were reported by the USS Rafael Peralta, the USS John Finn, and the USS Paul Hamilton. According to declassified deck logs, these objects maintained a constant proximity to the ships for hours, often appearing in conditions of low visibility and maintaining speeds of approximately 16 knots to match the vessels' movements.\n\n## Analysis of Declassified Records\n\nInvestigations led by independent researchers via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, notably through The Black Vault, successfully declassified hundreds of pages of Navy deck logs and internal briefing materials. These documents confirm that the Navy initially classified the objects as 'unmanned' but could not definitively identify their origin or operator. Despite the proximity to the California coast and the presence of advanced sensor suites, the Navy's intelligence summaries failed to conclude if the objects were domestic drones, foreign surveillance platforms, or anomalous craft. The 2024 AARO Historical Review and subsequent Congressional testimony have highlighted these events as critical examples of the ongoing challenge in maritime domain awareness regarding UAP. The objects' ability to match the speed of the destroyers while maintaining fixed positions suggests a propulsion technology that significantly exceeds commercially available drone capabilities, leading to ongoing security concerns within the Department of Defense.
— CHAIN OF CUSTODY: SOURCES & FURTHER READING
— FIELD REPORTS (0)
Sign in to post a field report.
No field reports yet. Be the first to contribute.
DISCLAIMER: Every story on this site is based on documented real-world reports or official records. We do not publish fiction. All sources are cited above.
